Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,023 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Federal Trial results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 8.6% saturation with 352 hits . Analysis detected 2,839 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,092 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 33% (25,271 of 37,536 keywords). This Federal Trial is better (less manipulative) than 67.30% of the peer group. Federal Trial
Keyword details
Total words: 4,092
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
33% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 32.7% percentile 2.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 8.2% 8.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 8.0% 8.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.9% 5.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 8.6% 8.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 9.1% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 3.7% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.8% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 0.3% Begging the Question: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst