Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video655 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Federal Recognition results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and In-Group Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 27.2% saturation with 534 hits. Analysis detected 2,630 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,965 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.4% and a BS Rank of 83% (6,281 of 35,675 keywords). This Federal Recognition is worse (more manipulative) than 82.40% of the peer group.
Federal Recognition
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
83%Federal Recognition (selected)6%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,965
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

82% percentile
025507510082.4% percentile
5.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 27.2%27.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 6.5%6.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 14.6%14.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 6.6%6.6%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 7.6%7.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 3.6%3.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Optimism Bias: Keyword 27.2%, sitewide 6.0%Framing Effect: Keyword 26.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 15.4%, sitewide 15.9%In-Group Bias: Keyword 14.6%, sitewide 6.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 8.1%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 4.0%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 3.1%Bandwagon: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.2%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.7%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.4%Optimism BiasSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos