Keyword summary
ā 78% 1 analyzed article/video 620 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Federal Program results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Optimism Bias , and Anecdotal , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 13.6% saturation with 253 hits . Analysis detected 1,927 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,860 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of ā 67% (12,627 of 37,536 keywords). This Federal Program is worse (more manipulative) than 66.40% of the peer group. Federal Program
Keyword details
Total words: 1,860
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
66% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 66.4% percentile 3.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0ā50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 13.6% 13.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.2% 6.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 13.0% 13.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 13.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 13.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 6.0% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 7.5% Anecdotal: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 5.2% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Recency Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 2.7% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 1.5% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 0.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.5% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.0% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst