Keyword summary
57%2 analyzed articles/videos176 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Federal Employees results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Slippery Slope, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 9.7% saturation with 436 hits. Analysis detected 4,774 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,512 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 60% (15,156 of 37,536 keywords). This Federal Employees is worse (more manipulative) than 59.60% of the peer group.
Federal Employees
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
60%Federal Employees (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,512
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

60% percentile
025507510059.6% percentile
3.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 7.3%7.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 5.5%5.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 7.8%7.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.9%0.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Keyword 7.0%7.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 6.4%6.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 3.3%3.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 7.5%Slippery Slope: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 1.7%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.1%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos