Keyword summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos630 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Federal Election Commission results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Ad Hominem, and Negativity Bias, with Politically Right Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 23.4% saturation with 778 hits. Analysis detected 4,693 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,326 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠74% (9,858 of 37,536 keywords). This Federal Election Commission is worse (more manipulative) than 73.70% of the peer group.
Federal Election Commission
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 3,326
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

74% percentile
025507510073.7% percentile
4.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 23.4%23.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 12.0%12.0%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 12.9%12.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 15.6%15.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 12.1%12.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 9.1%9.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.2%2.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 12.0%, sitewide 26.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 23.4%, sitewide 1.4%Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 15.6%, sitewide 5.3%Ad Hominem: Keyword 12.9%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 6.9%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 1.1%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 3.1%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.4%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.0%Tu Quoque: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos