Keyword summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos956 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Federal Cuts results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Loss Aversion, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 23.4% saturation with 769 hits. Analysis detected 4,823 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,284 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.6% and a BS Rank of 85% (5,842 of 37,536 keywords). This Federal Cuts is worse (more manipulative) than 84.40% of the peer group.
Federal Cuts
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
85%Federal Cuts (selected)6%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,284
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

84% percentile
025507510084.4% percentile
5.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 15.0%15.0%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Keyword 11.0%11.0%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Keyword 11.1%11.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 23.4%23.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 12.1%12.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.7%4.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 10.7%10.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.9%3.9%Sunk Cost EffectSitewide 0.3%Keyword 4.5%4.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 15.0%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 23.4%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.1%, sitewide 19.2%Loss Aversion: Keyword 11.1%, sitewide 2.5%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 11.1%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 11.0%, sitewide 1.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 10.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 4.0%Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 0.3%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 2.0%Slippery Slope: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 1.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 2.7%Burden of Proof: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.4%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate