Keyword summary
ā 0% 1 analyzed article/video 2,056 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fed Interest Rates results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Anecdotal , and Negativity Bias , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 23.1% saturation with 1,903 hits . Analysis detected 6,150 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,224 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ā 34% (24,930 of 37,536 keywords). This Fed Interest Rates is better (less manipulative) than 66.40% of the peer group. Fed Interest Rates
Keyword details
Total words: 8,224
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
34% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 33.6% percentile 2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles8.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0ā50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 23.1% 23.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 26.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 23.1%, sitewide 6.7% Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% False Dilemma: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.7% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst