Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video872 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fed Chair results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Optimism Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 14.2% saturation with 496 hits. Analysis detected 2,308 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,488 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 45% (20,910 of 37,536 keywords). This Fed Chair is better (less manipulative) than 55.70% of the peer group.
Fed Chair
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
45%Fed Chair (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,488
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

44% percentile
025507510044.3% percentile
2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.4%3.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 14.2%14.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.3%1.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.6%1.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.1%0.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 7.4%7.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 14.2%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 3.7%Red Herring: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.7%Begging the Question: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 0.8%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.5%Indoctrination: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.5%Circular Reasoning: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos