Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video981 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fci Dublin results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Pessimism Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 18.1% saturation with 710 hits. Analysis detected 4,285 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,924 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of 75% (9,417 of 37,533 keywords). This Fci Dublin is worse (more manipulative) than 74.90% of the peer group.
Fci Dublin
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
75%Fci Dublin (selected)5%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,924
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

75% percentile
025507510074.9% percentile
4.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.9%3.9%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Keyword 9.8%9.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.2%4.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 5.0%5.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 2.2%2.2%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Keyword 3.5%3.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 9.4%9.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 14.1%14.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 7.0%7.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 18.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 14.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 11.1%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 1.9%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 9.4%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 8.1%Anecdotal: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 5.2%In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 5.3%Bandwagon: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.5%Slippery Slope: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 3.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.0%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Indoctrination: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.0%Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.9%Composition/Division: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 0.2%Personal Incredulity: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos