Keyword summary
83% 1 analyzed article/video 986 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fat River Farm results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Hasty Generalization , and Anecdotal , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15% saturation with 445 hits . Analysis detected 2,964 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,958 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 63% (14,118 of 37,536 keywords). This Fat River Farm is worse (more manipulative) than 62.40% of the peer group. Fat River Farm
Keyword details
Total words: 2,958
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
62% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 62.4% percentile 3.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.6% 6.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.3% 6.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 15.0% 15.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 5.7% 5.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 8.1% 8.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 15.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 5.2% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 3.7% Indoctrination: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 0.0% Loss Aversion: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 2.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Straw Man: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.9% Horn Effect: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.0% Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Red Herring: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 0.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst