Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 546 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fang Fang results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Ad Hominem , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 22.3% saturation with 486 hits . Analysis detected 2,291 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,184 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of 75% (9,410 of 37,536 keywords). This Fang Fang is worse (more manipulative) than 74.90% of the peer group. Fang Fang
Keyword details
Total words: 2,184
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
75% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 74.9% percentile 4.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.2% 7.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 7.3% 7.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 14.6% 14.6% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 22.3% 22.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 8.8% 8.8% Red Herring Sitewide 0.7% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 7.0% 7.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 22.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 14.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 7.5% Ad Hominem: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 2.2% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 3.7% Red Herring: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 0.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.8% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.9% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.0% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.4% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.7% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.1% Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.6% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst