Keyword summary
⁠62%1 analyzed article/video1,033 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Family Care results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Anecdotal, and Appeal to Emotion, with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 7.4% saturation with 228 hits. Analysis detected 2,225 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,099 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠31% (26,103 of 37,536 keywords). This Family Care is better (less manipulative) than 69.50% of the peer group.
Family Care
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠31%Family Care (selected)3%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,099
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

31% percentile
025507510030.5% percentile
2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 5.5%5.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.9%1.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.6%3.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Sunk Cost EffectSitewide 0.3%Keyword 4.1%4.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.3%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 2.2%Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 0.3%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.5%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos