Keyword summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos850 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Faith Winter results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Halo Effect, and Anchoring Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 26.7% saturation with 572 hits. Analysis detected 3,574 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,144 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 6.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠87% (4,915 of 37,536 keywords). This Faith Winter is worse (more manipulative) than 86.90% of the peer group.
Faith Winter
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠87%Faith Winter (selected)7%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,144
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

87% percentile
025507510086.9% percentile
6.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 10.3%10.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 17.7%17.7%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 13.9%13.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 26.7%26.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Keyword 9.5%9.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 13.6%13.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.6%2.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 10.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 26.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 18.2%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 17.7%, sitewide 6.7%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 13.9%, sitewide 4.0%In-Group Bias: Keyword 13.6%, sitewide 6.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 13.0%, sitewide 11.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 9.5%, sitewide 2.7%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.0%Horn Effect: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 1.0%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 2.2%Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 1.4%Special Pleading: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 0.3%Loss Aversion: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 2.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.1%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.4%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Primacy Effect: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.8%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate