Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,226 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fairfax results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Appeal to Emotion, and Anecdotal, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 13.5% saturation with 331 hits. Analysis detected 2,486 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,452 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of 70% (11,510 of 37,536 keywords). This Fairfax is worse (more manipulative) than 69.30% of the peer group.
Fairfax
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
70%Fairfax (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,452
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

69% percentile
025507510069.3% percentile
3.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 6.2%6.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 13.5%13.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 9.6%9.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Keyword 6.7%6.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 9.4%9.4%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Keyword 4.0%4.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 1.7%1.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.6%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 13.5%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 10.1%, sitewide 9.1%Anecdotal: Keyword 9.4%, sitewide 5.2%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 6.9%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 2.2%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 4.0%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 1.4%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Appeal to Nature: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.7%Straw Man: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 0.9%Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.9%Composition/Division: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos