Keyword summary
⁠72%1 analyzed article/video881 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fair Political Practices Commission results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Ad Hominem, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 11.2% saturation with 295 hits. Analysis detected 1,995 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,643 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠49% (19,466 of 37,536 keywords). This Fair Political Practices Commission is better (less manipulative) than 51.90% of the peer group.
Fair Political Practices Commission
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 2,643
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

48% percentile
025507510048.1% percentile
2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 7.7%7.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.2%4.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 9.4%9.4%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 11.2%11.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.7%3.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.2%1.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.1%0.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.1%0.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 15.9%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 11.2%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.0%Ad Hominem: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 2.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.3%Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 0.6%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.0%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos