Keyword summary
86%1 analyzed article/video873 analyzed words
BS Summary: These F3 Innovate results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Appeal to Authority, and False Dilemma, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 20.4% saturation with 535 hits. Analysis detected 2,853 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,619 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 64% (13,767 of 37,536 keywords). This F3 Innovate is worse (more manipulative) than 63.30% of the peer group.
F3 Innovate
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
64%F3 Innovate (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,619
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

63% percentile
025507510063.3% percentile
3.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 0.2%0.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 20.4%20.4%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Keyword 7.0%7.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.0%4.0%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 5.0%5.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 2.2%2.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 12.0%12.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 26.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 20.4%, sitewide 6.0%Negativity Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 12.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 7.5%False Dilemma: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 1.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 4.6%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 5.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 0.5%Loss Aversion: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 2.5%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos