Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 748 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Eyes results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Hasty Generalization , and Optimism Bias , with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 2.9% saturation with 88 hits . Analysis detected 1,029 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,992 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 4% (36,170 of 37,536 keywords). This Eyes is better (less manipulative) than 96.40% of the peer group. Eyes
Keyword details
Total words: 2,992
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
4% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 3.6% percentile 1.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.5% Appeal to Nature: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.2% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.8% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.0% Indoctrination: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst