Keyword summary
61% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,287 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Exxonmobil results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Self-Serving Bias , and Overconfidence Bias , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 10.9% saturation with 468 hits . Analysis detected 4,711 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,308 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 47% (19,879 of 37,344 keywords). This Exxonmobil is better (less manipulative) than 53.20% of the peer group. Exxonmobil
Keyword details
Total words: 4,308
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
47% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 46.8% percentile 2.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 8.9% 8.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 10.9% 10.9% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Keyword 5.0% 5.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 8.6% 8.6% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 7.1% 7.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 10.7%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 10.9%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 3.7% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 4.6% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 7.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 3.3% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 5.3% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 1.1% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 4.0% Recency Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.8% Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst