Keyword summary
⁠8%3 analyzed articles/videos1,098 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Exploit results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Confirmation Bias, and Burden of Proof, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 5.5% saturation with 292 hits. Analysis detected 2,465 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,301 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠9% (34,404 of 37,536 keywords). This Exploit is better (less manipulative) than 91.70% of the peer group.
Exploit
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠9%Exploit (selected)2%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 5,301
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

8% percentile
02550751008.3% percentile
1.5% BS Score3 analyzed articles5.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 5.5%5.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.1%4.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.5%3.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%Burden of Proof: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 0.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 0.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos