Keyword summary
⁠50%1 analyzed article/video578 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Expensive Water results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Bandwagon, Anecdotal, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.3% saturation with 214 hits. Analysis detected 2,214 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,312 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠60% (15,182 of 37,536 keywords). This Expensive Water is worse (more manipulative) than 59.60% of the peer group.
Expensive Water
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠60%Expensive Water (selected)4%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,312
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

60% percentile
025507510059.6% percentile
3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 4.8%4.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.8%4.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 9.3%9.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.2%3.2%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Keyword 8.7%8.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.2%3.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.3%1.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Keyword 4.6%4.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 9.1%Bandwagon: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 2.2%Anecdotal: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 5.2%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 4.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 5.3%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 1.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 0.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.0%Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 0.8%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos