Keyword summary
41%2 analyzed articles/videos1,349 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Executive Privilege results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Confirmation Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 13.3% saturation with 540 hits. Analysis detected 2,846 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,047 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 41% (22,269 of 37,536 keywords). This Executive Privilege is better (less manipulative) than 59.30% of the peer group.
Executive Privilege
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
41%Executive Privilege (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,047
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

41% percentile
025507510040.7% percentile
2.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 8.4%8.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 10.8%10.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 13.3%13.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.5%1.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 4.3%4.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 13.3%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.6%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.1%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Primacy Effect: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%Composition/Division: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.2%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos