Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,615 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Evolution & Human Nature results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause) , Confirmation Bias , and Biased Writer Voice , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 7.4% saturation with 476 hits . Analysis detected 4,822 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,460 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 13% (32,702 of 37,536 keywords). This Evolution & Human Nature is better (less manipulative) than 87.10% of the peer group. Evolution & Human Nature
Keyword details
Total words: 6,460
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
13% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 12.9% percentile 1.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 6.4% 6.4% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 3.3% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.1% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst