Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,265 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ev Range results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Authority, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 7.4% saturation with 375 hits. Analysis detected 2,245 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,060 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 11% (33,518 of 37,536 keywords). This Ev Range is better (less manipulative) than 89.30% of the peer group.
Ev Range
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
11%Ev Range (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 5,060
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

11% percentile
025507510010.7% percentile
1.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.0%3.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 7.4%7.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.0%3.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 7.5%Indoctrination: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 0.0%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos