Keyword summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Ethics Violations results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Self-Serving Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 20.5% saturation with 701 hits. Analysis detected 3,812 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,416 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 36,715 keywords). This Ethics Violations is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Ethics Violations
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
0%Ethics Violations (selected)0%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,416
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 7.4%7.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Keyword 7.8%7.8%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 10.5%10.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.1%1.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 10.9%10.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 5.8%5.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 20.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 10.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 11.1%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 10.5%, sitewide 3.7%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 5.3%Burden of Proof: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 0.4%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.0%Special Pleading: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.3%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.0%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.6%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos