Keyword summary
⁠60%2 analyzed articles/videos1,134 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ethics Complaint results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Appeal to Authority, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.7% saturation with 481 hits. Analysis detected 3,511 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,965 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠35% (24,590 of 37,326 keywords). This Ethics Complaint is better (less manipulative) than 65.90% of the peer group.
Ethics Complaint
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠0%Javian Hawkins1%
⁠0%Atlanta Falcons1%
⁠35%Ethics Complaint (selected)3%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,965
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

34% percentile
025507510034.1% percentile
2.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.5%3.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.7%3.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 9.7%9.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 5.7%5.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.9%4.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 6.8%6.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 2.0%2.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 3.3%Halo Effect: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 5.2%Begging the Question: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 1.7%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Slippery Slope: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.1%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos