Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Esophageal Cancer results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Appeal to Emotion, and Optimism Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 14.2% saturation with 260 hits. Analysis detected 1,342 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,836 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 35,995 keywords). This Esophageal Cancer is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Esophageal Cancer
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
0%Esophageal Cancer (selected)0%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,836
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 2.7%2.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 14.2%14.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 7.3%7.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 5.2%5.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.3%1.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.3%1.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 14.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 10.0%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 6.0%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 5.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 0.5%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 4.6%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.3%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.8%Red Herring: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos