Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 2,005 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Erisa results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Negativity Bias , with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 10.9% saturation with 876 hits . Analysis detected 7,682 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,020 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 45% (19,796 of 35,715 keywords). This Erisa is better (less manipulative) than 55.40% of the peer group. Erisa
Keyword details
Total words: 8,020
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
45% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 44.6% percentile 2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 10.3% 10.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.6% 6.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.4% 4.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 10.3% 10.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 10.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 10.9%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 10.3%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 8.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 0.8% Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.1% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.9% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst