Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 959 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Erica Stoll results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Availability Heuristic , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 10.7% saturation with 410 hits . Analysis detected 3,975 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,836 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 49% (19,423 of 37,536 keywords). This Erica Stoll is better (less manipulative) than 51.70% of the peer group. Erica Stoll
Keyword details
Total words: 3,836
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
48% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 48.3% percentile 2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.3% 6.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.4% 5.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 10.4% 10.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 10.7% 10.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 5.4% 5.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 10.7%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 5.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 2.7% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 3.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.4% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.5% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.1% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst