Keyword summary
33% 1 analyzed article/video 1,368 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Eric Williams results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Anecdotal , and Hasty Generalization , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 11.2% saturation with 459 hits . Analysis detected 2,372 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,104 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 25% (28,449 of 37,536 keywords). This Eric Williams is better (less manipulative) than 75.80% of the peer group. Eric Williams
Keyword details
Total words: 4,104
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
24% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 24.2% percentile 2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 11.2% 11.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 11.2%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.4% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst