Keyword summary
34%5 analyzed articles/videos2,650 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Eric Schmitt results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Politically Right Leaning Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 7.2% saturation with 1,242 hits. Analysis detected 13,264 faulty-reasoning hits from 17,279 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 15% (29,470 of 34,294 keywords). This Eric Schmitt is better (less manipulative) than 85.90% of the peer group.
Eric Schmitt
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
15%Eric Schmitt (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 17,279
Article count: 5
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

14% percentile
025507510014.1% percentile
1.7% BS Score5 analyzed articles17.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 6.6%6.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 3.8%3.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 7.2%7.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.0%4.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.7%2.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.7%2.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 2.2%2.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 5.3%Halo Effect: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 1.4%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate