Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Eric Schmidt results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Ad Hominem, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.2% saturation with 441 hits. Analysis detected 3,506 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,100 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 36,741 keywords). This Eric Schmidt is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Eric Schmidt
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
0%Eric Schmidt (selected)0%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,100
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 12.2%12.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 13.3%13.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 8.4%8.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 8.8%8.8%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 5.4%5.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 14.2%14.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.4%4.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 12.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 14.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 13.3%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 9.1%Ad Hominem: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 2.2%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 1.5%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.1%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Red Herring: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos