Keyword summary
34% 3 analyzed articles/videos 2,052 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Environmental Science results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation) , Framing Effect , and Optimism Bias , with Overconfidence Bias as the most egregious example at 9.7% saturation with 1,105 hits . Analysis detected 8,805 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,355 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 23% (28,170 of 36,204 keywords). This Environmental Science is better (less manipulative) than 77.80% of the peer group. Environmental Science
Keyword details
Total words: 11,355
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
22% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 22.2% percentile 1.9% BS Score3 analyzed articles11.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.2% 6.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 6.3% 6.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 9.7% 9.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 11.1% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 4.6% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 0.8% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 2.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst