Keyword summary
94%1 analyzed article/video606 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Environmental Safeguard results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Emotion, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 19.6% saturation with 357 hits. Analysis detected 3,008 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,818 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.7% and a BS Rank of 85% (5,515 of 34,834 keywords). This Environmental Safeguard is worse (more manipulative) than 84.20% of the peer group.
Environmental Safeguard
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
85%Environmental Safeguard (selected)6%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,818
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

84% percentile
025507510084.2% percentile
5.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 9.8%9.8%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Keyword 9.8%9.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 13.0%13.0%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Keyword 9.2%9.2%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Keyword 8.5%8.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.7%4.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 6.8%6.8%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Keyword 6.4%6.4%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Keyword 5.5%5.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 4.3%4.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 19.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 12.4%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 13.0%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 11.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 1.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 2.0%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 9.1%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 1.9%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 5.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 0.8%Slippery Slope: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 1.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 6.0%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 1.1%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 4.0%Loss Aversion: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 2.5%Indoctrination: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 3.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Special Pleading: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.3%Burden of Proof: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.4%Begging the Question: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos