Keyword summary
37% 3 analyzed articles/videos 2,927 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Environmental Law results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Hasty Generalization , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.3% saturation with 947 hits . Analysis detected 8,819 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,996 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 16% (29,769 of 35,181 keywords). This Environmental Law is better (less manipulative) than 84.60% of the peer group. Environmental Law
Keyword details
Total words: 12,996
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
15% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 15.4% percentile 1.7% BS Score3 analyzed articles13K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 7.3% 7.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.1% 7.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 0.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.0% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst