Keyword summary
65% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,384 analyzed words
BS Summary: These England Vs Argentina results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Optimism Bias , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 31.6% saturation with 1,752 hits . Analysis detected 5,230 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,536 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 44% (21,120 of 37,536 keywords). This England Vs Argentina is better (less manipulative) than 56.30% of the peer group. England Vs Argentina
Keyword details
Total words: 5,536
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
44% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 43.7% percentile 2.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Keyword 31.6% 31.6% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.4% 5.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 31.6%, sitewide 0.5% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 4.6% Indoctrination: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 0.0% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Burden of Proof: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.4% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.5% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst