Keyword summary
94%1 analyzed article/video130 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Energy Risks results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Framing Effect, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 20% saturation with 78 hits. Analysis detected 489 faulty-reasoning hits from 390 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.5% and a BS Rank of 84% (6,309 of 37,536 keywords). This Energy Risks is worse (more manipulative) than 83.20% of the peer group.
Energy Risks
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
84%Energy Risks (selected)6%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 390
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

83% percentile
025507510083.2% percentile
5.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles390 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 11.0%11.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 20.0%20.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 5.9%5.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 12.8%12.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 16.7%16.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Circular ReasoningSitewide 0.1%Keyword 6.2%6.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.6%3.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.1%3.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 11.0%, sitewide 26.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 20.0%, sitewide 6.0%Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 19.2%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 16.7%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 15.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 12.8%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 8.1%Recency Bias: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 1.7%Circular Reasoning: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 0.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 1.5%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 5.3%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 1.9%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 4.0%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.8%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.5%Red Herring: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 0.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos