Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Energy Rebate results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Appeal to Authority , with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 8.2% saturation with 288 hits . Analysis detected 2,220 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,500 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Energy Rebate is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Energy Rebate
Keyword details
Total words: 3,500
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 8.1% 8.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 8.2% 8.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Anecdotal: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 5.2% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 3.3% Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 2.2% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.5% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 0.8% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst