Keyword summary
97%1 analyzed article/video435 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Energy Drinks results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Hasty Generalization, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 22.6% saturation with 295 hits. Analysis detected 1,950 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,305 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6% and a BS Rank of 87% (5,199 of 37,533 keywords). This Energy Drinks is worse (more manipulative) than 86.20% of the peer group.
Energy Drinks
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
87%Energy Drinks (selected)6%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,305
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

86% percentile
025507510086.2% percentile
6.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 14.3%14.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 22.6%22.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 5.8%5.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 10.7%10.7%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 9.8%9.8%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 6.0%6.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 5.8%5.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 12.7%12.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.2%1.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 14.3%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 22.6%, sitewide 11.1%Negativity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 12.7%, sitewide 8.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 10.7%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 4.0%Optimism Bias: Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 5.3%Halo Effect: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 6.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 0.5%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 0.8%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.0%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.1%Indoctrination: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos