Keyword summary
73% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,623 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Energy Department results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Optimism Bias , and Unattributed Quote , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 15% saturation with 1,182 hits . Analysis detected 7,187 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,869 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 40% (22,689 of 37,536 keywords). This Energy Department is better (less manipulative) than 60.40% of the peer group. Energy Department
Keyword details
Total words: 7,869
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
40% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 39.6% percentile 2.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 15.0% 15.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Keyword 7.3% 7.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 9.8% 9.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 15.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 11.8%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 7.5% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 1.1% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 3.7% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst