Keyword summary
76%2 analyzed articles/videos915 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Energy Demand results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Indoctrination, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 17% saturation with 545 hits. Analysis detected 4,583 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,212 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of 69% (11,254 of 35,675 keywords). This Energy Demand is worse (more manipulative) than 68.50% of the peer group.
Energy Demand
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
69%Energy Demand (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,212
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

69% percentile
025507510068.5% percentile
3.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 8.8%8.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 17.0%17.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 7.1%7.1%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 5.8%5.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 6.1%6.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.1%4.1%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Keyword 4.4%4.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 6.9%6.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 4.5%4.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 2.4%2.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 17.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 12.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 7.5%Indoctrination: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 3.3%In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 0.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 5.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 2.0%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 1.9%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 4.6%Red Herring: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 0.7%Begging the Question: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 1.7%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 4.0%False Dilemma: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 1.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.1%Composition/Division: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.2%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos