Keyword summary
58%6 analyzed articles/videos3,586 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Energy And Environment results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Authority, and Optimism Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 12.5% saturation with 1,781 hits. Analysis detected 14,689 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,215 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 35% (23,330 of 35,700 keywords). This Energy And Environment is better (less manipulative) than 65.30% of the peer group.
Energy And Environment
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
35%Energy And Environment (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

35% percentile
025507510034.7% percentile
2.3% BS Score6 analyzed articles14.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 4.3%4.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 12.5%12.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.7%3.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 11.8%11.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.8%3.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.6%1.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Keyword 0.1%0.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 5.3%5.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 12.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 11.8%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 6.0%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate