Keyword summary
99%1 analyzed article/video207 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Energy Affordability results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias, Negativity Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 62.9% saturation with 521 hits. Analysis detected 2,529 faulty-reasoning hits from 828 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 8.7% and a BS Rank of 94% (2,549 of 37,536 keywords). This Energy Affordability is worse (more manipulative) than 93.20% of the peer group.
Energy Affordability
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
94%Energy Affordability (selected)9%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 828
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

93% percentile
025507510093.2% percentile
8.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles828 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 62.9%62.9%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 47.5%47.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 28.4%28.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 8.7%8.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 33.9%33.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 18.4%18.4%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 11.1%11.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.4%1.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 7.6%7.6%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 9.7%9.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 62.9%, sitewide 5.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 47.5%, sitewide 1.4%Negativity Bias: Keyword 33.9%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 28.4%, sitewide 8.1%Framing Effect: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 26.9%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 18.4%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 11.1%, sitewide 15.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 11.1%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 11.1%Ad Hominem: Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 2.2%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Bandwagon: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 3.3%In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 6.9%Burden of Proof: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 0.4%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 3.1%Primacy Effect: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 0.9%Straw Man: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 0.9%Appeal to Nature: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 0.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos