Keyword summary
ā 88% 1 analyzed article/video 556 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Endangered Species Trump Extinction results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 18.3% saturation with 305 hits . Analysis detected 1,829 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,668 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of ā 72% (10,772 of 37,536 keywords). This Endangered Species Trump Extinction is worse (more manipulative) than 71.30% of the peer group. Endangered Species Trump Extinction
Keyword details
Total words: 1,668
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
71% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 71.3% percentile 4.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0ā50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 15.3% 15.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.8% 5.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 10.8% 10.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Keyword 5.5% 5.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 15.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 18.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 10.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.0% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 1.1% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 2.7% Begging the Question: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 2.0% Slippery Slope: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.0% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst