Keyword summary
0%4 analyzed articles/videos260 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Emperor Naruhito results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Halo Effect, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 21.4% saturation with 494 hits. Analysis detected 3,353 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,312 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.6% and a BS Rank of 84% (6,011 of 37,536 keywords). This Emperor Naruhito is worse (more manipulative) than 84.00% of the peer group.
Emperor Naruhito
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
84%Emperor Naruhito (selected)6%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,312
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

84% percentile
025507510084.0% percentile
5.6% BS Score4 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.5%4.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 15.3%15.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 10.7%10.7%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Keyword 8.9%8.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 21.4%21.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.3%2.3%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Keyword 6.8%6.8%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Keyword 6.3%6.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 8.6%8.6%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Keyword 4.2%4.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 21.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 15.3%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 9.1%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 2.2%Anecdotal: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 5.2%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 7.5%False Dilemma: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 1.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 2.2%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 6.0%Loss Aversion: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 2.5%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 1.1%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.8%Begging the Question: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Straw Man: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate