Keyword summary
⁠30%1 analyzed article/video1,185 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Emily Wilson Upenn Odyssey Christopher Nolan results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Confirmation Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 7.3% saturation with 261 hits. Analysis detected 2,127 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,555 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠32% (25,531 of 37,536 keywords). This Emily Wilson Upenn Odyssey Christopher Nolan is better (less manipulative) than 68.00% of the peer group.
Emily Wilson Upenn Odyssey Christopher Nolan
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 3,555
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

32% percentile
025507510032.0% percentile
2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.8%3.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.1%3.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.8%1.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos