Keyword summary
ā 0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,121 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Emily Bronte results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Hasty Generalization , and Confirmation Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 44.9% saturation with 1,510 hits . Analysis detected 7,729 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,363 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.6% and a BS Rank of ā 89% (4,316 of 36,899 keywords). This Emily Bronte is worse (more manipulative) than 88.30% of the peer group. Emily Bronte
Keyword details
Total words: 3,363
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
88% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 88.3% percentile 6.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0ā50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 34.9% 34.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 44.9% 44.9% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.0% 7.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 22.4% 22.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 20.6% 20.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Fundamental Attribution Eā¦ Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 10.1% 10.1% Straw Man Sitewide 0.9% Keyword 6.7% 6.7% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 7.3% 7.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Negativity Bias: Keyword 44.9%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 34.9%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 26.9% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 22.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 20.6%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 15.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 11.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 10.1%, sitewide 2.7% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 9.1% Ad Hominem: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 2.2% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 6.7% Straw Man: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 0.9% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 4.6% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 1.4% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 2.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 3.7% Horn Effect: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 1.0% False Dilemma: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst