Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,048 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Emil Bove results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Ad Hominem , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 63.3% saturation with 2,653 hits . Analysis detected 11,026 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,192 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.3% and a BS Rank of 91% (3,588 of 37,536 keywords). This Emil Bove is worse (more manipulative) than 90.40% of the peer group. Emil Bove
Keyword details
Total words: 4,192
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
90% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 90.4% percentile 7.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 63.3% 63.3% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 24.8% 24.8% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 9.5% 9.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 24.7% 24.7% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Keyword 15.7% 15.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 30.4% 30.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Straw Man Sitewide 0.9% Keyword 9.2% 9.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 63.3%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Keyword 30.4%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Keyword 9.5%, sitewide 26.9% Ad Hominem: Keyword 24.8%, sitewide 2.2% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 24.7%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 10.7%, sitewide 15.9% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 15.7%, sitewide 2.0% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 11.1% Straw Man: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 0.9% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 7.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 3.3% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 6.9% Horn Effect: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 1.0% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.0% Slippery Slope: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 1.7% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% False Dilemma: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 1.5% Begging the Question: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 1.7% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 1.1% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 4.6% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 3.1% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 0.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst