Keyword summary
95%1 analyzed article/video833 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Emergency Reserves results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Availability Heuristic, with Recency Bias as the most egregious example at 15.5% saturation with 387 hits. Analysis detected 3,294 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,499 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.7% and a BS Rank of 78% (7,949 of 35,181 keywords). This Emergency Reserves is worse (more manipulative) than 77.40% of the peer group.
Emergency Reserves
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
78%Emergency Reserves (selected)5%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,499
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

77% percentile
025507510077.4% percentile
4.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Keyword 15.5%15.5%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Keyword 14.6%14.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 9.5%9.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 7.2%7.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 9.2%9.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.2%0.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 2.6%2.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 15.9%Recency Bias: Keyword 15.5%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 14.6%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 12.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 9.6%, sitewide 9.1%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 4.0%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 7.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 0.8%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 3.3%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 4.6%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 1.1%Slippery Slope: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 2.2%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.5%Begging the Question: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos