Keyword summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Emergency Medical Services results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Hasty Generalization, and In-Group Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 12.5% saturation with 306 hits. Analysis detected 1,900 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,440 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 35,445 keywords). This Emergency Medical Services is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Emergency Medical Services
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
0%Emergency Medical Services (selected)0%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,440
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 5.0%5.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 5.3%5.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 4.9%4.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.9%1.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 12.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 6.7%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 5.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 0.8%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.1%False Dilemma: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.5%Burden of Proof: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.5%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.4%Indoctrination: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.0%Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos