Keyword summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos2,359 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Embargoes And Sanctions results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Pessimism Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.7% saturation with 539 hits. Analysis detected 5,378 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,070 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 28% (27,262 of 37,536 keywords). This Embargoes And Sanctions is better (less manipulative) than 72.60% of the peer group.
Embargoes And Sanctions
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
28%Embargoes And Sanctions (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 8,070
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

27% percentile
025507510027.4% percentile
2.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 6.6%6.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 6.7%6.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.1%0.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.2%0.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 5.9%5.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.7%3.7%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Keyword 6.2%6.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 6.7%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 1.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 5.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 0.8%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos